Showing posts with label threat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label threat. Show all posts

Monday, February 9, 2015

FOX NEWS POLL: Voters disagree with vision Obama expressed in State of the Union - Fox News Poll: Nearly half of voters say Obama downplaying Islamic terror threat - READ THE POLL RESULTS

SOTU.jpg January 20, 2015: U.S. President Barack Obama delivers his State of the Union address to a joint session of the U.S. Congress on Capitol Hill in Washington. (REUTERS/Larry Downing)

Many American voters are not on the same page as President Obama when it comes to the mood of the country and his economic proposals. Yet significant improvements in perceptions of the economy are boosting approval of the president — and less than half of voters want his executive actions repealed.

First, Americans don’t think we’re the happy family President Obama described in his State of the Union speech.  A new Fox News national poll released Wednesday finds that by a three-to-one margin, voters see America as a dysfunctional family rather than as the “tight-knit” grouping Obama claimed we are (73-24 percent).

Click here for full results of the poll (pdf)

Men, women and voters of all age groups endorse the dysfunctional description, and even a majority of Democrats — 61 percent — agrees. Still, Democrats are more than twice as likely as Republicans to call America a tight-knit family (37 vs. 14 percent).

Voters also sharply disagree with the president’s strategy of taking government actions to help improve economic conditions specifically for the middle class. By a 26-point margin, they think government policies should help improve the economy for everyone (61 percent) rather than target actions just for the middle class (35 percent). Even voters describing themselves as middle class think the focus should be on improving the economy overall (59 percent) rather than just for the middle class (37 percent). 

When it comes to helping everyone versus the idea of “spreading the wealth,” voters are more evenly divided. Forty-six percent think it is a good idea and 45 percent a bad idea to use some of the money government collects in taxes to “spread the wealth” to others who are less well off. That’s unchanged since 2008 when it was also 46 percent good idea vs. 45 percent bad.

Perhaps predictably, that view breaks down along income-related lines. Voters in households earning less than $50,000 like the idea of spreading the wealth (by a 12-point margin), while those earning $50,000 or more don’t like it (by a 9-point margin). Those voters describing themselves as middle class are more evenly divided: 45 percent call it a good idea and 47 percent say bad idea.

Roughly two-thirds of Democrats think spreading the wealth is a good idea (69 percent), while two-thirds of Republicans say the opposite (68 percent).

There’s more agreement that things are improving, as 53 percent of voters think the economy is getting better. That’s up 10 percentage points from 43 percent in September — and marks a new high during Obama’s presidency. The previous high was 49 percent recorded in both October 2012 and May 2010. Still, for 36 percent of voters it feels like economic conditions are getting worse. 

Those living in higher-income households (58 percent) are more likely than those in lower-earning households (48 percent) to say the economy is getting better. In addition, voters under age 45 (59 percent) are more likely than those ages 45 and over (48 percent) to feel things are improving.

Democrats (72 percent) are more than twice as likely as Republicans (35 percent) to say things are looking up on the economy. 

Despite a record-high number saying the economy is improving, only 19 percent say they are better off financially now than when Obama took office. Some 28 percent feel they are worse off, while a slim 52-percent majority says their family’s financial situation is about the same.

Sunnier perceptions of the economy have helped Obama’s job rating: 45 percent of voters approve of how he is doing, while 51 percent disapprove. While his rating is still in negative territory, this is the first time since October 2013 that approval of the president’s performance has been this high. Last month, 42 percent approved and 53 percent disapproved. 

The increase in approval of Obama comes mainly from independents: 45 percent approve now, compared to just three in 10 in early January (31 percent) and December (30 percent).

And Congress also gets its best ratings in more than a year, although that’s not saying a lot: 18 percent approve, while 73 percent disapprove. The last time approval of Congress was this high was July 2013. In December, 14 percent approved of Congress and 80 percent disapproved.

Now that Republicans control Congress, some wonder if GOP lawmakers will try to cancel or repeal the unilateral actions Obama has taken through executive orders. Voters have mixed views: 45 percent want Congress to repeal Obama’s unilateral actions, yet 39 percent disagree. 

Political identification plays a big role in that assessment: most Republicans want Obama’s executive orders repealed (by 71-17 percent), while Democrats oppose that idea (60-23 percent). Independents split: 40 percent for repeal and 40 percent against.

Pollpourri

Voters resoundingly reject Obama’s proposal to start taxing so-called 529 college savings accounts: fully 82 percent call that a bad idea, including 80 percent of Democrats. The disapproval climbs to an overwhelming 88 percent among parents. The White House announced late Tuesday it will withdraw plans to tax these accounts. 

More than four in 10 American voters describe themselves as middle class (43 percent), and another 13 percent say they are “upper” middle class. Even 38 percent of those with household annual income over $100,000 consider themselves middle class.

Just 15 percent of voters think the country is safer than when Barack Obama became president. More than twice as many — 34 percent — feel the country is less safe now. The largest number — 50 percent — say things are the same.

The Fox News poll is based on landline and cell phone interviews with 1,009 randomly chosen registered voters nationwide and was conducted under the joint direction of Anderson Robbins Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R) from January 25-27, 2015. The full poll has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points.


View the original article here



FOX NEWS POLL: Voters disagree with vision Obama expressed in State of the Union - Fox News Poll: Nearly half of voters say Obama downplaying Islamic terror threat - READ THE POLL RESULTS

Thursday, January 29, 2015

California declares electronic cigarettes a health threat

660_ECig.jpg

California health officials on Wednesday declared electronic cigarettes a health threat that should be strictly regulated like tobacco products, joining other states and health advocates across the U.S. in pushing back against the fast-growing device.

The California Department of Public Health report says e-cigarettes emit cancer-causing chemicals and get users hooked on nicotine, although there is still more research to be done on the immediate and long-term health effects.

New generations of young people will become nicotine addicts if the products remain largely unregulated, California Health Officer Ron Chapman said.

“Without action, it is likely that California’s more than two decades of progress to prevent and reduce traditional tobacco use will erode as e-cigarettes re-normalize smoking behavior,” the report says.

E-cigarettes heat liquid nicotine from cartridges into inhalable vapor without tar and other chemicals found in traditional cigarettes. E-cigarette makers say using their products, known as “vaping,” is far safer than tobacco.

“Despite the health officer’s false claims, there is ample evidence that vaping helps smokers quit and is far less hazardous than smoking,” Gregory Conley, president of the e-cigarette advocacy group American Vaping Association, said in an email. “Smokers deserve truthful and accurate information about the relative risks of different nicotine products, not hype and conjecture based on cherry-picked reports.”

The California report called for restrictions on the marketing and sale of e-cigarettes, protections against accidental ingestion of liquid nitrogen and an education campaign on the dangers of using e-cigarettes. California has already banned the sale of e-cigarettes to minors in 2010.

A state senator introduced legislation this week that would regulate e-cigarettes as tobacco products and ban their use in public places such as hospitals, bars and schools. A similar bill was defeated last year over opposition from tobacco companies.

Other states, including Oklahoma, Tennessee and Arkansas, already have issued advisories cautioning the use of e-cigarettes.


View the original article here



California declares electronic cigarettes a health threat

Monday, January 19, 2015

"CREDIBLE THREAT" Authorities: Ohio bartender threatened to kill Boehner

A former Ohio country club bartender — who told authorities that he was Jesus Christ — threatened to murder House Speaker John Boehner last fall because he believed the Ohio congressman was responsible for Ebola, according to records made available Tuesday.

A grand jury indictment filed in U.S. District Court in Ohio on Jan. 7 identified the accused man as Michael R. Hoyt, a resident of Cincinnati.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

A separate criminal complaint said Hoyt was fired last fall from his job at a country club in West Chester, Ohio, where he served drinks to Boehner, who is a member.

In a subsequent conversation with a police officer, Hoyt said that before leaving, he “did not have time to put something in John Boehner’s drink,” according to the complaint.

The court paper also said, “Hoyt told the officer he was Jesus Christ and that he was going to kill Boehner because Boehner was mean to him at the country club and because Boehner is responsible for Ebola.”

According to the criminal complaint, Hoyt said he had a loaded Beretta .380 automatic pistol and he was going to shoot Boehner. Hoyt volunteered to be taken to a psychiatric hospital, and police took his weapon.

He is currently being held under a court order for mental evaluation and treatment, and U.S. Capitol Police and the FBI believe he “poses a current and ongoing credible threat” to Boehner, the complaint added.

The complaint says Hoyt was treated for a previous psychotic episode about two years ago. He was prescribed medication “which he voluntarily stopped taking” about six months ago, it added.

A senior congressional source told Fox News that Hoyt was committed to a mental institution from October through the end of December but then was released. Once he was out, law enforcement felt strongly enough to move to indict him to get him off the street because of the potential threat posed to Boehner.

“He said some things that really spooked us,” said one senior congressional source who is familiar with the case but asked not to be identified.

As speaker of the House, Boehner is second in line for the presidency in the event of a vacancy. His congressional district includes part of western Ohio.

A spokesman for Boehner, Michael Steel, said the speaker is “aware of the situation and sincerely thanks the FBI, the Capitol Police and the local authorities in Ohio for their efforts.”

The Capitol Police could not be reached for immediate comment.

It was not clear why officials waited as long as they did to disclose the charge. The grand jury indictment is dated Jan. 7, but the incident referred to in the papers took place on Oct. 29 of last year, and the complaint itself was filed on Nov. 6.

Fox News’ Chad Pergram, Lucas Tomlinson and The Associated Press contributed to this report.


View the original article here



"CREDIBLE THREAT" Authorities: Ohio bartender threatened to kill Boehner

Sunday, October 19, 2014

India 2016 tour of Caribbean under threat

Saturday, October 18, 2014 | 3:20 PM    

MUMBAI, India (CMC) — The West Indies Cricket Board’s finances could take another huge hit with the Indian Cricket Board (BCCI) saying Saturday it was now reviewing its 2016 tour of the Caribbean.

Indian officials are fuming after West Indies players abandoned the one-day tour of India Friday, following the fourth One-Day International in Dharamsala, over a pay dispute with their union, the West Indies Players Association.

The players’ move scuppered Monday’s final ODI carded for Kolkata, the lone Twenty20 International in Cuttack on Wednesday, and the three-Test series that was expected to bowl off October 30th.

“It will be very difficult to play West Indies in bilateral series in future. They have to demonstrate the willingness that such situations never happen again,” international media quoted BCCI secretary Sanjay Patel as saying.

“I would say that India’s next tour of West Indies is highly unlikely to go ahead in the current situation.”

The series started under a cloud of uncertainty with West Indies players threatening to withdraw their services ahead of the first ODI in Kochi, over their contractual grouse with WIPA.

They argued the new terms of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, which WIPA signed recently with the West Indies Cricket Board, would result in a drastic reduction in their earnings.?

Like our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/jamaicaobserver

Follow us on Twitter https://twitter.com/JamaicaObserver


View the original article here



India 2016 tour of Caribbean under threat

Friday, July 25, 2014

Abu Bakr issues “threat” to Trinidad security forces

Abu-BakrPORT-OF-SPAIN, Trinidad, Thursday July 24, 2014, CMC – The Trinidad and Tobago government says “ all usual systems remain in place to deal with any or all threats to public safety” after the leader of the Jamaat Al Muslimeen group, Yasin Abu Bakr, said he was not prepared to “accept” security forces entering a mosque during the holy month of Ramadan.

Bakr, who lead an unsuccessful coup against the then ANR Robinson administration on July 27, 1990, said he was prepared to “respond appropriately” if the security forces continue “this transgression against us…end of talk.”

But in a statement issued late on Wednesday night, the Ministry of National Security said that regarding the public statements made by Bakr, it was advising citizens “that while there is no evidence of any threat, all usual systems remain in place to deal with any or all threats to public safety and security.

Click here to receive free news bulletins via email from Caribbean360. (View sample)

“These measures are part of the nation’s upgraded defence mechanisms which remain in place on an ongoing basis,” the Ministry said in its statement.

Bakr’s outburst during a radio programme here on Wednesday night followed .what he claimed was the unlawful detention of people at a mosque in Carapo, south of here earlier this week.

Bakr warned acting Commissioner of Police Stephen Williams, National Security Minister Gary Griffith and Roger Alexander, head of the North Eastern Division Task Force that “the question of coming into the mosque in Ramadan and detaining people unlawfully will not, and I repeat will not be accepted.

“Big man Alexander, if you think you can do whatever you want and you are not accountable to God, Mr Commissioner of Police, Mr Griffith, this is Abu Bakr, I am saying if you continue this transgression against us, we will respond appropriately, end of talk.”

The police said they had detained 18 people, including Rajaee Ali, the coordinator of the controversial LifeSport programme here that Prime Minister Kamla Persad Bissessar has removed from the Ministry of Sport and placed under the Ministry of National Security. She has also asked for an audit into the multi-million dollar programme.

Police said that the 18 people were detained for a variety of offences, including an alleged kidnapping of two Latin American tourists four months ago.

Earlier this month, two of Ali’s brothers were arrested by members of the Criminal Gang and Intelligence Unit. Two other men affiliated with the mosque were also detained. They were later released without charge.

Ali, a former murder accused, was arrested in May soon after the murder of prominent senior counsel, Dana Seetahal, who was killed on May 4. He was released without any charges being laid against him.

Police said then he was not a suspect in that killing and Ali has said he did not kill Seetahal.

Bakr said he intends to meet with senior police and national security officials on Thursday, noting that those detained during the police exercise on Tuesday had not yet been charged.

Williams had earlier defended the police action, saying that the arrests were lawful.

At least 24 people, including one government legislator, Leo Des Vignes, were killed when Bakr led 114 members of his Muslim group in coordinated attacks on the Parliament and the Trinidad and Tobago Television (TTT) station in his attempt to overthrow the then government

After six days of negotiation, the insurgents surrendered on August 1, and were taken into custody. They were tried for treason, but the Court of Appeal upheld the amnesty offered to secure their surrender, and they were released. The London-based Privy Council, the country’s highest court, later invalidated the amnesty, but the Muslimeen members were not re-arrested.

A number of people including former prime minister Basdeo Panday has testified before a Commission of Inquiry probing the events that led to the insurrection.

Bakr, 72, has in the past refused to testify before the Commission citing an ongoing case against him in the High Court.


View the original article here



Abu Bakr issues “threat” to Trinidad security forces

Wednesday, July 16, 2014

Sugar Industry under threat as Government implements $30m drought plan

Jamaica’s multi-billion dollar sugar industry is now under major threat due to the effects of  the worsening dry spell.

The Sugar Industry Authority, SIA, says the next Crop could be in jeopardy with the forecast of  below average rainfall for the rest of  the year. According to Chairman of  the SIA, Ambassador Derrick Heaven, the scorching dry spell has coincided with replanting for the Crop and there will be serious implications.
Ambassador Heaven says the situation is cause for alarm.

And the Government will be implementing a $30m drought mitigation project for farmers across the island next week.  That’s the word from Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of  Agriculture and Fisheries, Donovan Stanberry.

The project will involve the Rural Agricultural Development Authority, the Jamaica Agricultural Society, farmers and political representatives.  Mr. Stanberry says the Government is also investing in rainwater harvesting systems, and looking to build micro dams through its climate change programme.     


View the original article here



Sugar Industry under threat as Government implements $30m drought plan

Monday, June 23, 2014

No devaluation threat to the dollar, says Barbados opposition Finance Spokesman

Sunday, June 22, 2014 | 10:09 AM    

BRIDGETOWN, Barbados (CMC) — There is no immediate danger of the currency being pushed below its present value although other economic indicators are sliding, says Clyde Mascoll, the opposition Barbados Labour Party’s (BLP) spokesman on finance.

“In spite of the fact that we were having a fiscal crisis problem, and we continue to have one; in spite of the fact that our economy has not been growing for the last six years; in spite of the fact unemployment has been rising, the one economic indicator in Barbados that was positive for the last six years was the adequacy of the foreign reserves at the Central Bank,” Mascoll said recently.

He added:  “If we can get the fundamentals right and do other things and get the policy prescription right, then we should not even be using the word [devaluation] in Barbados”.  

These comments from Mascoll, came at the same day other economic pundits were pointing to increased difficulty in obtaining foreign exchange from the Central Bank and a continued slide of the economy behind those of the CARICOM region.

Disputing a government minister’s claim that there is no problem for individuals and companies obtaining money for overseas transactions, immediate past president of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Barbados, David Simpson, claimed that a squeeze on foreign currency access is on.

“I’ve heard some denial from one Cabinet minister this week, but I have experienced it, and one or two of my clients have as well,” Simpson said.

While speculating that the current difficulty in obtaining foreign exchange might be a case of the Central Bank strictly applying an old Barbados policy on release of such funds, Simpson  insisted that the restrictions are now in place regardless of the reason.

“I can tell you it is the case, which suggests there is still some concern in terms of the foreign exchange reserves,” he added.

With no conventional natural resources in significant quantity, Barbados depends on earnings gained through licensing offshore companies, tourism, and a small manufacturing export industry for its foreign currency.

The Central Bank reported that as of March, 2014, the island’s foreign reserves stood at BDS$1.1 billion (Bds $1.00 = US$0.50) that covers 16 weeks of imports.

Also on that day, leading investment banker, Jason Julien, spoke of a need to ring ‘alarm bells’ if there was not economic improvement.

He spoke of the island’s weak economic growth, high debt levels, weak foreign exchange earnings, and its susceptibility to external shocks.

“When we look at the Barbados economy compared to the rest of the region as a whole, the reality is we are lagging behind at this point…The average growth rate expected for Barbados is 0.6 per cent, and when you look at the Caribbean as a whole, it exceeds that,” said Julien.

Like our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/jamaicaobserver

Follow us on Twitter https://twitter.com/JamaicaObserver


View the original article here



No devaluation threat to the dollar, says Barbados opposition Finance Spokesman