Showing posts with label transfers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label transfers. Show all posts

Monday, January 19, 2015

GOP senators push bill to limit Gitmo transfers, call for ‘time out’ after attacks

Guantanamo Prisoners _AP_660.jpg This March 1, 2002 file photo shows a detainee at Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Base, Cuba. (AP)

Republican senators on Tuesday introduced new legislation to clamp down on President Obama’s ability to transfer terror suspects out of Guantanamo Bay, calling for a “time out” on releasing detainees in the wake of the Paris terror attacks.

Sen. Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire introduced the far-reaching legislation to “extend and enhance prohibitions and limitations” on transferring or releasing Guantanamo prisoners.

She cited the steady stream of detainees allegedly tied to Al Qaeda who have been transferred in recent months, even to Yemen, which she called the “wild West” for terrorists.

“It’s clear that we need a time out,” she said.

A Yemeni government official briefed on the investigation into last week’s terror attacks in France told Fox News that one of the suspects in that attack met with American cleric Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen in 2011 at an Al Qaeda camp.

The Yemen connection has raised new concerns about transfers to that country and elsewhere, and GOP senators who joined Ayotte on Tuesday said the Paris attack shows that governments are limited in their ability to monitor suspects.

Joining Ayotte in backing the measure were Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain of Arizona; Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr of North Carolina; and Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina.

The measure would repeal current law that has allowed the administration to transfer prisoners to foreign countries and reduce the population at Guantanamo to 127. The bill also would prohibit transfers of terror suspects to foreign countries if there has been a confirmed case where an individual was transferred from Guantanamo and engaged in any terrorist activity. It would specifically bar transfers to Yemen for two years.

Further, the bill would prohibit the transfer of terror suspects considered to be high-risk or medium-risk – some of the recently transferred detainees fell into those categories.

The administration is currently conducting an assessment of all detainees at the facility, and is almost certain to oppose the Senate legislation.

On Tuesday, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said closing the facility is “in the clear national security interest” of the country.

“That continues to be the goal that this administration has,” Earnest said. 

State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf echoed the White House in calling it a security priority to close the prison camp. Asked about the specific legislation, she said, “that’s not something we think is going to help us close Guantanamo” and stressed the importance of working with other countries to transfer detainees. 

Obama has pushed to close Guantanamo since his inauguration in January 2009, but has faced strong opposition from congressional Republicans and some Democrats who argued that the facility is the best location for terror suspects since the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. Past laws have repeatedly included provisions barring any transfer of terror suspects to U.S. prisons.

The administration has been transferring detainees cleared for movement to other countries. Five men who were held for a dozen years without charge at Guantanamo were sent to the Central Asian nation of Kazakhstan for resettlement in late December.

Nearly 30 prisoners were resettled in third countries last year as part of Obama’s renewed push to close the detention center.

The Senate measure also would bar the use of any government funds, whether in the budget for the Defense Department or in any other agency, to construct or modify facilities in the United States to house terror suspects.

Fox News’ Catherine Herridge and The Associated Press contributed to this report.


View the original article here



GOP senators push bill to limit Gitmo transfers, call for ‘time out’ after attacks

Saturday, September 7, 2013

European clubs spend $2.3B on player transfers

LONDON, England (AP) — The world’s richest football league is getting even richer, although the wealth of English clubs is also benefiting teams overseas.

In less than three months during the European transfer window, more than $2.3 billion was spent by clubs in the continent’s top five leagues — with a third of that shipped by Premier League sides overseas, according to an analysis by accountancy firm Deloitte.Such spending might seem at odds with the economic hardships being experienced by many fans, but the transfer window splurges are not slowing down.Even though there are relatively new Financial Fair Play regulations in European football, the days of the big-money moves are not over.“If a price of a player is high or not high, I think this is the market and we cannot intervene in this market,” FIFA President Sepp Blatter said yesterday. “It is definitely a European market.”In less than three months, £490 million (US$760 million) of the £630 million (US$980 million) paid out by English sides landed in bank accounts abroad — up 60 per cent year-on-year.The record spending spree, though, was in part the result of Tottenham generating 100 million euros (US$132 million) by selling Gareth Bale to Real Madrid in a world-record deal.Even though Spaniards have been in recession for much of the past four years, they turned out in their thousands on Monday to laud the arrival of a player reportedly being paid around 350,000 euros (US$461,000) a week.The head of world football can see how incongruous that looks.“You say the country is a poor country or indebted, but in football you always find money,” Blatter said. “If a player is the value of that (100 million euros), I doubt, I doubt, but I cannot stop this. Gareth Bale, he can prove now that he is better than (Cristiano) Ronaldo.”Spanish top-flight clubs, however, did make an overall transfer profit in the summer of 110 million euros (US$145 million) and Italian sides had a 12 million-euro (US$16-million) surplus.Financial planning wasn’t so astute elsewhere.Net spending by Premier League clubs was £400 million (US$622 million), while the figure was 150 million euros (US$198 million) in France, and 60 million euros (US$79 million) in Germany.The spending power of England’s top-flight clubs has been strengthened by new television deals that are generating more than US$8.5 billion over the next three years.“Testament to the impact (the TV revenue) is having is in the scale of Premier League gross spending, as well as the gulf in net spending between the Premier League and other European leagues,” said Alex Thorpe from Deloitte’s sports division.“Whereas many clubs around Europe have been reliant on selling players in order to spend, the financial advantages Premier League clubs enjoy have enabled net spending of £400 million across the league.”Around £140 million (US$218 million) was shelled out by Premier League clubs on the frantic final day on the transfer window, with Arsenal scrambling to break their transfer record to bring Mesut Ozil from Real Madrid for a club record 50 million euros (US$66 million).Deadline-day can create a frenzy, with champion Manchester United managing to squeeze just one notable deal over the line — Marouane Fellaini joined from Everton for £27.5 million (US$43 million) — despite months pursuing talent across Europe.Despite calls to close the transfer window before the season starts, finding an agreeable date across Europe is tough.“I agree it is too long but the whole world is involved and don’t play at the same time as we do,” UEFA President Michel Platini said. “The clubs also want to have transfers finished before the start of their competition.

View the original article here



European clubs spend $2.3B on player transfers