Showing posts with label convicted. Show all posts
Showing posts with label convicted. Show all posts

Monday, September 16, 2013

Teen convicted of killing baby gets life in prison

News

Thursday, September 12, 2013 | 5:51 PM

BRUNSWICK, Georgia (AP) — A Georgia teenager convicted of fatally shooting a baby in a stroller while trying to rob the child’s mother was sentenced Thursday to life in prison without parole.De’Marquise Elkins, 18, was sentenced in Georgia’s Glynn County Superior Court less than two weeks after a jury found him guilty of murder in the slaying of 13-month-old Antonio Santiago.The toddler was in his stroller and out for a walk with his mother when he was shot between the eyes March 21 in the Georgia coastal city of Brunswick. The mother and a younger teenager charged as an accomplice testified at the trial that Elkins killed the boy after his mother refused to give up her purse.Elkins was spared the death penalty because the killing occurred when he was 17, which the US Supreme Court has ruled is too young to face capital punishment. Under Georgia law, the only possible punishments for Elkins were life with or without a chance of parole.Prosecutors said Sherry West was pushing her son in his stroller as she walked home from a post office when two teenagers approached her that day in March, just a few blocks from her apartment.Dominique Lang, 15, testified at the trial he was with Elkins when the older teen pulled a gun and demanded West’s purse. When she refused to give it to him, Lang said, Elkins twice threatened her baby and counted down from five.West testified she pleaded with Elkins that she had no money and tried to cover her child with her arms as the gunman fired a warning shot, fired a bullet into her in the leg and shot her baby in the face.Police recovered a .22-calibre revolver from a saltwater pond, and prosecutors said it matched the gun used in the killing. Prosecutors also have said information from Elkins’ mother and sister led them to the weapon.Lang also faces murder charges in the case. No trial date has been set and it’s unknown how his cooperation in the prosecution of Elkins might affect how his case gets handled.Elkins’ mother, Karimah Elkins, stood trial alongside him and was convicted of evidence tampering for helping dispose of the gun. Elkins’ sister and aunt have also been charged with trying to help him avoid prosecution in the case.The killing in the Southeast port city of Brunswick drew national attention and Elkins’ trial was moved more than 300 miles away to the Atlanta suburbs because of pre-trial publicity.Elkins’ never testified at his two-week trial in August. But his defence attorneys argued police rushed to build a case against Elkins without considering other possible suspects. They even suggested the slain child’s own parents may have been the real killers.Kevin Gough, Elkins’ lead attorney, has said he plans to appeal the murder conviction.

View the original article here



Teen convicted of killing baby gets life in prison

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Over 6,000 convicted in Corporate Area RM courts

News

Sunday, September 08, 2013

JUST over 6000 Jamaicans who have been convicted in the Corporate Area Resident Magistrate’s (RM) courts for crimes they committed, will be paying the cost in the form of fines and/or prison time imposed by the courts.Statistics compiled by the Criminal Records Office of the Jamaica Constabulary Force for the period January to July this year, show that a total of 6,150 Jamaicans were convicted in the Corporate Area RM Courts and were sentenced to serve a total of 1,254 years and/or fines amounting to $37.5 million.This figure brings the total number of persons convicted in the country to 10,512, sentenced to serve a total of 6,214 years and/or monetary fines amounting to $90.5 million, taking the Home Circuit Court and the other parishes into consideration.The analysis of the figures show that the monetary fines and prison time imposed on those convicted by the Corporate Area RM courts account for 41.6 per cent and 22 per cent of the totals, respectively. The figures show that the Corporate Area RM court convicted 1,788 more individuals for criminal offences, than the other courts combined. These offences included smoking ganja, possession of ganja or cocaine, dealing in, trafficking and attempting to export ganja or cocaine, wounding, assault, larceny, malicious destruction of property and fraud-related offences. The analysis of the figures revealed that 71 per cent were convicted for drug-related offences, 14 per cent for assault and wounding offences, five per cent for larceny and the remaining two per cent included break-ins, robberies and malicious destruction of property.The Constabulary Communication Network in a statement said that the Police are reminding Jamaicans that the commission of crimes, regardless of how simple it may seem, comes at a cost. The Police remain committed to enforcing law and are sending the message that any disregard for the laws of the land will not go unpunished.The Police are appealing to citizens to consider the consequences of their actions, as a criminal record can have far-reaching implications for their future, including career and immigration restrictions.

HOUSE RULES


1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.


2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.


3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.


4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.


5. Please don’t use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed:mailto:advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.


6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.


7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy

comments powered by

View the original article here



Over 6,000 convicted in Corporate Area RM courts

Monday, September 9, 2013

Over 6000 people convicted in the Corporate Area RM court since January

KINGSTON, Jamaica – The Jamaica Constabulary Force (JCF) is reporting that just over 6000 people have been convicted in the Corporate Area Resident Magistrate’s (RM) court with fines totalling $37 million since the start of the year.

Statistics compiled by the Criminal Records Office of the JCF for the period January to July 2013 show that a total of 6150 people were convicted in the Court and sentenced to serve a total of 1,254 years and/or fines amounting to $37.5 million, the police said in a release Saturday.According to the police the figure from the Corporate Area RM court brings the total number of people convicted in the country to 10,512, sentenced to serve a total of 6,214 years and/or monetary fines amounting to $90.5 million taking the Home Circuit Court and the other parishes into consideration.The offences included ganja smoking, possession of ganja or cocaine, dealing in, trafficking and attempting to export ganja or cocaine, wounding, assault, larceny, malicious destruction of property and fraud related offences. Analysis of the figures reveal that 71 per cent were convicted for drug related offences, 14 per cent for assault and wounding offences, five per cent  for larceny and the remaining two per cent covered break-ins, robberies and malicious destruction of property, the police said.Like our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/jamaicaobserverFollow us on Twitter https://twitter.com/JamaicaObserver

View the original article here



Over 6000 people convicted in the Corporate Area RM court since January

Saturday, August 10, 2013

Have you ever been convicted of a criminal offence?

IF you’ve ever applied for a visitor’s visa, you’ve been asked this question. If you work in a regulated industry, like financial services or insurance, you’ve had to answer this question. If you’ve even registered with an online dating website (I’ve been told) you’ve probably been asked — “Have you ever been convicted of a criminal offence?” You’d think that this is a straightforward yes or no matter, but it’s actually more complex than that. If you’ve ever been convicted of an offence, including minor traffic offences, or if you’ve ever put that question to a potential employee, this article is for you.

Too often, especially in a relatively small society like Jamaica, a criminal record is akin to a life sentence. Even after you’ve paid the fine or served the time, the record is stuck on you like a lewd Vybz Kartel tune. That’s why we have the Criminal Records (Rehabilitation of Offenders) Act, the purpose of which is to specify a period after which the convicted person is treated as having been rehabilitated and the conviction is treated as spent. Under the Act, a conviction is spent:*after three years, where the conviction does not include imprisonment;*after five years, where the conviction includes imprisonment for less than six months;*after eight years, where the conviction includes imprisonment for between six and 18 months;*after 10 years, where the conviction includes imprisonment for more than 18 months but less than three years.In each case, time begins to run from the end of the prison term, the payment of the fine, or compliance with any other condition, for example, community service. Under the Act, a person whose conviction is spent is required to disclose the details of that conviction, if asked, when seeking to become a member of certain professions, including lawyers, doctors, accountants, nurses and teachers. Similarly, disclosure is also required if applying for certain types of employment, including a judge, police officer, private security guard, soldier, banker, insurance agent and stockbroker. Noticeably absent from the list of professions requiring disclosure are politicians (presumably the political party will deal with them) and Ministers of Religion (presumably God will deal with them).One may apply to have a spent conviction expunged after a further period of rehabilitation ranging from three to 10 years depending on the sentence. That application is heard by the Criminal Records Board. At that point, it’s almost as if the conviction never happened at all. Almost.In this, the Information Age, a person’s record isn’t stored only in a Government office. It’s taking up cyberspace. It’s residing on the servers of the media houses that reported on the case. It’s tagging you on Facebook and hash-tagging you on Twitter. It may not matter, therefore, that it’s an offence under the Act for someone to maliciously disclose the fact that a person was convicted of an offence after that conviction is spent or expunged. You can’t sue the Internet. The fact is, now more than ever, employers are performing background checks on Google before checking with the Criminal Records Office.Employers ought to be aware that, by law, it’s an offence to refuse to hire, or to dismiss someone, because of a spent or expunged conviction if the employer has reasonable cause to suspect that the conviction is spent or has been expunged and the convicted person was not obliged to disclose the conviction. This raises a number of important questions, including: If my business doesn’t fall into the category of professions that would require the applicant to disclose the conviction, may I still ask the question on the application form? If the applicant dishonestly and without legal justification answers that he hasn’t been convicted and I later discover the dishonesty but only after the conviction is spent, can I dismiss the employee then, and if so for what? Am I required by law to destroy an application form after a certain period of time if the form asks whether the person has been convicted? What if I only ask if the person has been charged with an offence and not whether he’s also been convicted? These are all serious and complex issues, the answers to which often depend on the particular circumstances of the case, the nature of the business and the nature of the offence.Finally, it’s important to note that convictions involving sentences for longer than three years cannot be expunged. This is good news for all the soon-to-be criminals formerly known as ‘smokers’ as they will still have the chance to maintain a healthy record, if not lungs.Gavin Goffe is a Partner at Myers, Fletcher & Gordon and a member of the Firm’s Litigation Department and Labour Law Practice Group. Gavin may be contacted at gavin.goffe@mfg.com.jm or through www.myersfletcher.com. This article is for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

HOUSE RULES


1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.


2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.


3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.


4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.


5. Please don’t use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed:mailto:advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.


6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.


7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy

comments powered by

View the original article here



Have you ever been convicted of a criminal offence?