Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts

Saturday, October 11, 2014

DOUBLE STANDARD? Pols question WH review of prostitution scandal

While government investigators interviewed hundreds of personnel to get to the bottom of the Secret Service prostitution scandal in Colombia in 2012, congressional Republicans suggest the White House barely lifted a finger to investigate similar allegations involving one of their own.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, in an interview with Fox News on Thursday, questioned how seriously the White House handled claims that a member of their team may have been “intimately involved with a prostitute.”

He said he’s concerned, further, about a “cover-up.”  

But even as far back as November 2012, in a letter obtained by FoxNews.com, another top Republican pointedly accused the White House of conducting a flimsy review into the allegations.

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., charged at the time that documents reviewed by his committee staff showed the White House review was “woefully inadequate.”

Issa, in his Nov. 2, 2012, letter to then-White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler, claimed the Secret Service director had given Ruemmler records from the Hotel Hilton Cartagena that “suggested” someone on the White House advance team signed in a 28-year-old female guest. Issa said documents show the guest entered at 12:02 a.m. and left at 9:46 a.m. (This claim appears to align with details reported late Wednesday by The Washington Post, which identified the advance team “volunteer” as Jonathan Dach, then 25, whose father Leslie is a consistent Democratic donor.)  

But according to Issa, “the initial White House review” of this incident – before that information was turned over — “appears to have consisted of talking to one person,” the advance team member in question, who was asked whether he had engaged a prostitute. 

“Like several Secret Service agents who subsequently failed polygraph tests, the White House staff denied that he had,” Issa wrote.

But even after then-Director Mark Sullivan handed over the additional details, Issa said the White House claimed to have simply “re-interviewed the staff member” and interviewed several colleagues, “who vouched for his character.”

By contrast, the Secret Service interviewed “dozens of hotel staff and female foreign nationals,” while the DHS inspector general’s team interviewed 251 Secret Service personnel. The investigation included a review of hotel records, polygraphs and even drug tests, Issa wrote.

But Issa claimed there is, by contrast, “no indication” that Ruemmler’s office interviewed hotel staff or the woman said to be involved.

The letter from Issa was sent after he initially questioned the internal review on Oct. 11, 2012. In that letter, he noted that then-White House Press Secretary Jay Carney had claimed in April 2012 “there have been no specific, credible allegations of misconduct” by a White House team member, and their review likewise produced “no indication” of any misconduct. 

Ruemmler eventually wrote back to Issa, on Nov. 9, 2012, asserting the same: “We did not identify any inappropriate behavior on the part of the White House advance team.” Even after learning additional information, she wrote, “our conclusion did not change.”

Issa said the individual in question had done advance work for President Obama on “eight prior official overseas trips,” including in Tokyo, Brazil and Baghdad. He said correspondence attached to his request for a passport reflected him as “White House staff with the Executive Office of the President.”

The White House says he was a volunteer. The Post reports he was not paid a salary but was paid a per diem and reimbursed for expenses. 

White House visitor logs for 2012, meanwhile, recorded several visits to the White House by people named Jonathan Dach and Leslie Dach in 2012. The records show a Jonathan Dach visited the White House in March 2012 – the records say he was visiting “POTUS,” which is short for president of the United States.

The records show that shortly after the Colombia controversy in April 2012, a Leslie Dach visited on April 24 for a meeting with Alan Krueger, then chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers.

The records also reflect a June 3, 2012 visit by Jonathan, Leslie and Elizabeth Dach. (Eliza Dach is apparently the name of Leslie Dach’s daughter.) Other key details about that visit, though, were not entered into the official White House log.

Leslie Dach’s name shows up in the logs for other visits during the rest of the year.  

After The Washington Post reported that senior White House aides had information about these allegations and never thoroughly investigated them, the White House stuck by its claims.

“As was reported more than two years ago, the White House conducted an internal review that did not identify any inappropriate behavior on the part of the White House advance team,” spokesman Eric Schultz said.

Schultz said the White House counsel asked the Secret Service for information at the time, which turned up a hotel log. But the White House previously has claimed the volunteer was wrongly implicated based on inaccurate hotel records.

Questioned by reporters on Air Force One, Schultz reiterated Thursday afternoon that the White House reviewed the evidence and stands by the conclusion of that inquiry. He said it was a careful review, and noted that a Secret Service agent similarly implicated through a hotel log was later exonerated.

Richard Sauber, an attorney representing Jonathan Dach, also denied the allegations in a statement to Fox News and said his client was not even standing with the woman in question when she presumably put down her information in the hotel log. He said his client did not sign the paper with the woman’s information on it.

“The allegations about any inappropriate conduct by Jonathan Dach in Cartagena are utterly and completely false. Anyone who knows Jonathan knows how ludicrous these allegations are,” Sauber said.

“The Post bases its allegations almost exclusively on a hotel log with the name of a prostitute and a room number. Yet neither Jonathan Dach’s name nor his signature appears on the hotel log or any piece of paper with a foreign national,” he said.

Chaffetz, in an Oct. 3 letter to White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, has asked for “all documents” related to the White House counsel review.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., also sent a letter on Thursday to Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson requesting the same documents, saying he’s “concerned” the administration did not “properly investigate or discipline its own staff.”

FoxNews.com’s Jana Winter and Judson Berger, and Fox News’ Catherine Herridge, Kelly Chernenkoff and Lesa Jansen contributed to this report.


View the original article here



DOUBLE STANDARD? Pols question WH review of prostitution scandal

Thursday, September 18, 2014

Jamaica government to review e-cigarette ban

A closeup photo of an e-cigarette on the black background.

KINGSTON, Jamaica, Tuesday September 16, 2014, CMC – Less than 24 hours after it announced an immediate ban on the importation of electronic cigarettes, Health Minister Dr. Fenton Ferguson said he plans to meet with stakeholders amid suggestions that some concessions could be granted.

An e-cigarette is a battery-powered vaporiser, which simulates tobacco smoking, by producing an aerosol that resembles smoke.

On Monday, the Ministry of Health advised Jamaica Customs to immediately cease clearance of electronic cigarettes already in the island and halt importation of the item.

The decision was criticised by cigarette distributor Carreras, which said that the stance taken by the Ministry would impact thousands of Jamaicans and businesses.
But Dr. Ferguson said the decision was made by a technical team and based on all the factors involved, it will be reviewed.

Click here to receive free news bulletins via email from Caribbean360. (View sample)

“Persons must be given adequate time to deal with the present situation and (concerning) any question of permit they should have adequate time and public information before it is done.

“Therefore my decision is that after consultations with the Permanent Secretary, my Chief Medical Officer and my director (and) we will withdraw the position until further notice,” Dr. Ferguson said, adding he was also prepared to meet with the stakeholders to hear their concerns.

“I will be giving the stakeholders time to deal with the present situation while we are engaged in conversation,” he said.


View the original article here



Jamaica government to review e-cigarette ban

Tuesday, July 1, 2014

Judicial review of decision to regulate TT used car sector

Trinidad & Tobago’s Express newspaper has reported that senior counsel Russell Martineau has asked for time to speak with Minister of Trade, Industry, Investment and Communications Vasant Bharath before the court considers granting a stay of a decision to regulate that country’s foreign-used car industry.

The newspaper reports that Martineau, appearing before Justice Frank Seepersad in the San Fernando High Court on Monday, said he needed to get instructions from his client to submit to the court.

He also reportedly told the judge that on April 7, Cabinet did not approve the draft 2013 to 2017 policy in relation to the regulation of the foreign-used car industry, and it was sent to the General Financial Committee.

The Trinidad & Tobago Automotive Dealers Association filed for judicial review of the decision to implement the new policy, which was due to come into force on April 15.

The Association has claimed that there was no consultation and the decision announced by Bharath last month and the Minister’s decision was irrational, unreasonable and contrary to the principals of natural justice.

The Automotive Dealers Association was granted a stay two weeks ago, restraining the Minister from implementing the policy.


View the original article here



Judicial review of decision to regulate TT used car sector

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

AM Best removes ratings of Sagicor companies from under review

Business

Friday, August 16, 2013

INSURANCE ratings agency AM Best removed Sagicor’s affiliates from “under review with negative implications” and affirmed their financial strength and issuer credit ratings.Sagicor Life Insurance in the US as well as Sagicor General Insurance, Sagicor Life Inc and Sagicor Capital Life Insurance in Barbados were all affirmed as excellent, while Sagicor Life Jamaica was affirmed as having good ratings.All, except for the US operations, received a stable outlook for the ratings. The Texas-based operations’ ratings were assigned a negative outlook.“Concurrently, AM Best has removed from under review with negative implications and affirmed the ICR of “bbb-” and the debt rating of “bbb” on US$150 million, 7.5 per cent senior unsecured notes, due 2016 of the ultimate parent, Sagicor Financial Corporation,” said a press statement issued by the ratings agency on Wednesday. “The outlook assigned to these ratings is stable.”AM Best said that the rating affirmations reflect the organisation’s continued satisfactory capitalisation, consistent earnings in its life insurance segments and favourable operating results.The ratings were placed under review following the National Debt Exchange (NDX) in Jamaica, which was the second debt exchange in three years.“Although SFC continues to have significant business and financial exposure to the Jamaican economy through its controlling interest in SLJ, AM Best believes the exposure is somewhat mitigated by the sustained favourable performance of SFC’s Jamaican operations and the somewhat stabilised financial condition in Jamaica,” said the release. “Supported by profitable operations, SFC’s risk-adjusted capitalisation remains adequate, including its business risk exposures in its Jamaican operations.”The negative outlook for Sagicor Life USA is due to consistent statutory operating losses on both the life and annuity lines of business, although the losses have been consistently declining as the new business stabilises. AM Best was also concerned about the lack of diversification of the company’s business profile.“While the company maintains an adequate level of risk-adjusted capital, this is the result of parental support rather than organic growth,” said AM Best. “Moreover, AM Best notes that its capital structure contains a large portion of surplus notes to its parent.”The ratings agency said that a decline in SFC’s earnings and capital further deterioration in Jamaica (given the region’s continued elevated sovereign risk) or deterioration in the financial position of SFC could lead to a negative rating action on Sagicor.

View the original article here



AM Best removes ratings of Sagicor companies from under review

Monday, August 12, 2013

Federal prosecutors to review case of J"can youth killed by NYPD officer

NEW YORK, United States (CMC) — United States federal prosecutors say they will review the case of a Jamaican youth killed by a New York Police Department (NYPD) officer to determine whether the civil rights of the unarmed youth were violated.

The US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York made the announcement a day after a grand jury in the Bronx, New York refused to re-indict white police officer Richard Haste, who last year shot dead Ramarley Graham, 18, in his Bronx home.Haste was indicted in June 2012, four months after the shooting of Graham on February 2, 2012, in the bathroom of his home.But, in May, Bronx Supreme Court Justice Steven Barrett tossed the case, stating that an assistant district attorney wrongly instructed the grand jury to disregard whether other cops had told Haste that Graham was armed. Graham was, in fact, unarmed, prosecutors said.Barrett gave the Bronx District Attorney’s Office leave to re-indict Haste, but the second grand jury this week decided against a manslaughter charge.The announcement by the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York came as demonstrators Thursday protested the grand jury’s decision.They likened the case to that of Trayvon Martin, the 17-year-old black youth, who was fatally shot by neighbourhood watch volunteer, George Zimmerman, in Sanford, Florida.In what protesters said was a blatant miscarriage of justice, Zimmerman was acquitted last month of the charges by an all-white female jury.“The criminal justice system has failed us, just as it failed the family of Trayvon Martin,” said Constance Malcolm, Ramarley’s Jamaican-born mother, at a rally outside of the Bronx District Attorney’s office.Frank Graham, Ramarley’s Jamaican-born father, also repeated the words of Martin’s parents after Zimmerman was acquitted of second-degree murder.“If Ramarley had been white, would this have happened. He was in his home, where you’re supposed to be free and safe.”Graham family attorney, Jeffrey Emdin, described the decision not to indict Haste as a punch in the gut. “We feel it’s an injustice. We feel that this officer is getting away with murder. It’s a really, really sad day. The family is terribly disappointed. They think it’s a travesty, and we are going to be pursuing a federal investigation.”Bronx District Attorney Robert Johnson said his office is “surprised and shocked by the grand jury’s finding of criminal liability in the death of Ramarley Graham. “We are saddened for the family of the deceased young man,” he said.Patrick Lynch, president of the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association, the union that represents law enforcement officers in New York City, agreed with the grand jury’s decision.“This grand jury recognised that Police Officer Haste was pursuing what he had every reason to believe was a man with a gun,” he said, adding that Haste faced “imminent danger”.The NYPD said Haste remains on modified duty following the grand jury’s decision.

HOUSE RULES


1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.


2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.


3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.


4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.


5. Please don’t use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed:mailto:advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.


6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.


7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy

comments powered by

View the original article here



Federal prosecutors to review case of J"can youth killed by NYPD officer

Thursday, August 1, 2013

Govt to announce review of smoking ban regulations

Latest News

Sunday, July 28, 2013 | 6:45 PM

KINGSTON, Jamaica — Top officials of the People National Party (PNP) Sunday said Health Minister Fenton Ferguson is to announce a new set of regulations for the smoking ban implemented on July 15.PNP officials however have not disclosed details of the changes which should be made public this week.“I think you will see some adjustment for various areas in terms of the penalties,issues in terms of the definition of public spaces among other things,” said PNP General Secretary Peter Bunting, who did not elaborate on the specifics.According to Party Chairman Robert Pickersgill the decision comes following a series of meetings, held between officials of the PNP duringtheir National Executive Council (NEC) at the UWI Mona Inter Faculty Lecture Theatre today.Like our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/jamaicaobserverFollow us on Twitter https://twitter.com/JamaicaObserver

View the original article here



Govt to announce review of smoking ban regulations

Saturday, June 29, 2013

Chuck calls for review of Anti-Gang Bill before debate

OPPOSITION spokesman on national security and justice, Delroy Chuck, says he hopes that the Criminal Justice (Suppression of Criminal Organisations) or “Anti-Gang Act, will be reviewed by a Joint Select Committee of Parliament before it is debated and passed.

“I have not had a chance to peruse the Bill to see how it has changed from the last draft, but there is no doubt that it will be put to a parliamentary committee,” Chuck told the House of Representatives, as he spoke in the Sectoral Debate Tuesday, shortly after the Bill was tabled by Security Minister Peter Bunting.“It is obvious that it is not really geared to fighting gangs, but criminal organisations, even though the memorandum of objects and reasons is the same,” Chuck said.He said that one of the things that has to be recognised in dealing with the Act, is that most of the gangs to be targeted are really “temporary, evanescent” groups, which are formed then disappear. ]In other words] they are not as organised as the Mafia”, he said.The Opposition spokesman said, however, that he was happy to see the Bill, after some 18 months, pointing out that he had dealt with an earlier draft prior to leaving office as minister of national security and justice in the previous Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) Administration, in 2011.Chuck, noting that there was need for effective legislation to assist the police, the prosecution and the judicial system in dealing with crime, said that under the JLP, six crime Bills that were piloted and passed in the House in 2010 were significant and effective in bringing about decline in murders and the crime rate, “even though others contend that it was the Tivoli incursion that caused the decline”.Said Chuck: “These six crime Bills were allowed to lapse and, if they had been renewed, the increase and escalation in robberies and shootings over the past two years may have been kept under control.”He noted that two important pieces of legislation — the Anti-Gang and DNA Bills — were left to reach this House, almost 18 months after the current administration came to office.“The DNA legislation has been promised, but one wonders if we will see it any time soon,” said the Opposition spokesman.“Crimefighting demands an urgency and priority to provide the tools, resources and laws to aid the police, prosecution and the judicial process. Lets get on with the necessary legislation,” he stated.

HOUSE RULES


1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.


2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.


3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.


4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.


5. Please don’t use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed:mailto:advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.


6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.


7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy

comments powered by

View the original article here



Chuck calls for review of Anti-Gang Bill before debate