Showing posts with label alive. Show all posts
Showing posts with label alive. Show all posts

Monday, January 19, 2015

VA"s letter offers sympathies for death of veteran who"s very much alive - VIDEO: VA"s mix-up

A disabled Army veteran’s wife received a letter from the Department of Veterans Affairs this month extending its sympathies on the death of her husband, James Fales.

The problem? James Fales was the one who opened the letter.

“At first, it was kind of a shock; then it became humorous, to a point,” Fales, who served 11 years in the military and retired as a sergeant, told “Fox & Friends” Sunday.

The VA letter, dated Jan. 8, 2015, to Dee Fales was meant to offer condolences and to include information about death benefits and burial expenses that will be covered by the Department of Veterans Affairs, KFSM-TV reported.

CLICK TO READ THE VA’s LETTER TO DEE FALES.

When James Fales called the VA to alert them about the error, “They asked to verify who I was calling about, and I told them ‘By the way, this is me!’” Fales said. “And the only response I got on the phone was, ‘Oh boy.’ So now they are processing me to put me back as alive in the VA system.”

During the interview with “Fox & Friends,” Fales said that while the benefits division of the VA had him listed as deceased, the VA health care system had him very much alive.

“Since the government says I’m dead now, can I stop paying taxes?”

- James Fales

“I was still making doctors’ appointments,” said Fales, who is being treated for post-traumatic stress disorder and an ankle injury, according to KFSM.

Fales is unsure how the mixup may impact his medical care and says he and his wife are optimistic the VA will fix the error.

The Veterans Health Care System of the Ozarks issued the following statement, according to KFSM:

“We do apologize and regret that this error has occurred, and want to reassure our Veterans that we will work diligently to assist them in any way we are able to in order to resolve the issue.”

Being listed as dead hasn’t killed Fales’ sense of humor, however.

“Since the government says I’m dead now, can I stop paying taxes?” he joked.


View the original article here



VA"s letter offers sympathies for death of veteran who"s very much alive - VIDEO: VA"s mix-up

Saturday, October 11, 2014

IRAN NUKE BLAST Experts: Explosion proves nuclear program still alive

parchpic.jpg Satellite photos from before and after Sunday’s blast show an explosion that some experts say proves Iran’s nuclear weapons program is real. (IsraelDefense.com)

The massive blast at an Iranian nuclear plant earlier this week remains shrouded in mystery, but it cleared up one thing, according to those who track the Islamic Republic: The nuclear weapons program Tehran has long denied is real.

The massive blast Sunday night rocked buildings more than 10 miles away, and before-and-after satellite images published by the Israel Defense Force showed startling destruction at a facility Iran has repeatedly barred international inspectors from entering.

“[The] images indicate that a complete section of structures was simply eliminated by an unexplained explosion,” IDF analyst Ronen Solomon said. “The explosion wiped several testing units off the face of the earth while inflicting collateral damage on adjacent buildings.”

Iran, which initially denied an explosion took place, was forced a day later to own up to a blast, via the IRNA official Iranian news agency. The report said two people had been killed as a result of a fire at the site. The true casualty figure may never be known.

“The explosion wiped several testing units off the face of the earth while inflicting collateral damage on adjacent buildings.”

- Ronen Solomon, IDF analyst

Israel has long insisted that Iran’s charm offensive, successful in easing western sanctions, is a ruse to buy time while it pursues nuclear weapons.

“Don’t be fooled by Iran’s manipulative charm offensive,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned the UN General Assembly in New York on Sept. 29. “It’s designed for one purpose and for one purpose only: to lift the sanctions and remove the obstacles to Iran’s path to the bomb.

“Once Iran produces atomic bombs,” Netanyahu added, “all the charms and all the smiles will suddenly disappear. They’ll just vanish. And it’s then that the ayatollahs will show their true face and unleash their aggressive fanaticism on the entire world.”

As in past cases when things explode or scientists are killed in Iran, speculation centers on Israeli intelligence agencies, who, just as predictably, do not comment. Both misplaced blame and proper credit serve the purpose of burnishing their reputation within enemy and terrorist regimes. There are other possibilities, including that it was an accident or that Iranian dissident groups or western intelligence agencies played a role.

“If someone did succeed in infiltrating the Parchin site with explosives and causing the huge explosion which took place there, we are talking about an exceptional achievement,” regional terror analyst Ronen Bergman suggested in Wednesday’s Ynet.com.

Parchin, a site to which international inspectors have repeatedly been denied access since 2007 – a fact that many opponents of the P5+1 talks have long insisted in itself makes a mockery of the so-called negotiation process – is rumored to be the location of the development of the key warhead components required for making a nuclear bomb.

“Western officials suspect that at the heart of this secret development is the weapon group developing the nuclear lens mechanism,” Bergman said. “It’s a complex system of timers and explosives assembled around the core of the bomb, which explode in a way that “pushes” the enriched uranium sphere inwards and starts the chain reaction needed for an atomic explosion. If the smoking gun for the existence of the weapon group is found, it will serve as decisive evidence that Iran has been lying and that there is no point in negotiating with it.”

The assassination of a series of Iranian nuclear scientists inside Iran in recent years as the result of bombs planted on, or next to their vehicles by mysterious motorcycle-riding hitmen, together with the vicious Stuxnet computer virus that hit Iran’s key Natanz nuclear facility in 2010, has allegedly put the brakes on the Islamic Republic’s nuclear project.

According to Amnesty International, thousands of dissidents languish in Iranian jails, (including a significant number of journalists). Iran is second only to China in the number of executions it carries out each year, often following only a token trial.

 Regime support is also indicated in the September 2013 massacre of at least 52 Iranians in neighbouring Iraq at the Camp Ashraf refugee camp that had been designated a safe haven for Iranian activists, many of whom had opposed the direction of their nation’s nuclear ambitions. U.S. officials were reportedly furious at Iran’s Revolutionary Guard praising the attack, while Foreign Policy magazine reported that, “U.S. intelligence officials believe that Iranian commandos took part [in the attack].”

Paul Alster is an Israel-based journalist. Follow him on Twitter @paul_alster and visit his website: www.paulalster.com.


View the original article here



IRAN NUKE BLAST Experts: Explosion proves nuclear program still alive

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Burned alive for protesting

9 September 2013 Last updated at 19:41 ET By Mike Lanchin BBC World Service Carmen Quintana before (l) the attack, and after (r) Carmen Quintana before (left) and after the attack (right) Forty years ago, Gen Augusto Pinochet seized power in Chile – 17 years of military rule followed, during which thousands of people were tortured or killed. One woman who was doused with kerosene and set on fire, survived to tell the tale.


Carmen Quintana has one lasting image from the day, 27 years ago, when she and another young Chilean student were attacked, and set alight by soldiers during an anti-government protest.


“I just looked down at my blackened hands and at my burning clothes, and I suddenly saw myself in flames,” she says.


It was 2 July 1986, the first of two days of nationwide strikes in Chile against Augusto Pinochet’s rule.


Eighteen-year-old Carmen was a serious young woman with thick bushy hair, from a left-wing family fiercely opposed to the Pinochet regime. From an early age she had gone with her parents on anti-government demonstrations – and had witnessed first-hand the repression meted out by the feared Carabineros, Pinochet’s jackbooted police.

“We believed in what we were doing, and we thought we could bring about change,” she says.

With the organisers of the July 1986 protests promising to make it the biggest opposition show of force in years, Carmen had helped rally support among other students at her university. Word had gone around that Pinochet had ordered thousands of extra soldiers on to the streets as reinforcements.


But as Carmen and her comrades made their way on foot to join the crowds already gathering in the centre of Santiago early that July morning, no-one had reason to believe that the day’s demonstrations would be different from any others.


Speaking to the BBC from her adopted home in Montreal, Canada, where she sought refuge almost three decades ago, Carmen talks slowly, carefully recounting each detail of the events that scarred her mentally and physically.


Now 45 years old and married with three daughters, she is clearly still grappling with the horrors of the past.


Carmen and a small group of students reached the Avenida General Velasquez, one of the main arteries running through central Santiago, just as other protesters were beginning to erect makeshift barricades out of old tyres.

“We ran into some guys who asked us if we wanted to help,” she says. “Sure, we replied, why not.”

Then suddenly an army jeep came around the corner, full of soldiers. Their faces were all painted and they were wearing combat gear.


Tossing the tyres to one side, the youngsters fled in different directions. The soldiers jumped out and gave chase. Only Carmen and another student, 19-year-old Rodrigo Rojas Denegri, were caught. The rest got away.


“They grabbed Rodrigo first and threw him to the ground, kicking him. They put me up against the wall and searched me. I could see Rodrigo lying there, bleeding. They said to me, ‘What were you doing, where were you going?’ I said, ‘Going to the university, to study.’ They swore at me and hit me with the butt of their machine guns. I began to cry.”


Another group of soldiers then appeared, carrying a couple of tyres and a bottle of kerosene. “So this is what you were up to, right?” one of the soldiers said.


General Augusto Pinochet (l) waves from the motorcade 11 September 1973 in Santiago, shortly after his coup that killed President Allende Gen Augusto Pinochet (left) just hours after the 11 September 1973 coup

Carmen was still standing against the wall and Rodrigo was still on the ground. Neither of them replied. One of the officers took the bottle of kerosene and began to pour its contents over Carmen, soaking her from top to bottom. He did the same to Rodrigo, dousing him “as if he was watering a plant”, she says.


Carmen pauses. Her voice drops. This is the most painful part of her tale. At that stage, she says slowly, she had still thought that the soldiers were only trying to make fun of them and would soon let them go. She even remembers saying to herself, “I’ll have to go home now and get washed, and I won’t make it to the demos.”

Continue reading the main story A group of soldiers overlook the presidential palace in Santiago on 11 September 1973 - the day of the coup 1970 – Salvador Allende becomes world’s first democratically elected Marxist president11 September 1973 – General Augusto Pinochet ousts Allende in coup17 years of military rule follow About 3,000 people were killed or disappearedDec 2006 – Pinochet dies in Santiago aged 91Though accustomed to the regime’s violence, nothing had prepared her for what would happen next.

“All of a sudden one of the soldiers threw something close to us, like a Molotov cocktail. And as it hit the ground it exploded, and Rodrigo and I turned into human torches.” The flames quickly took hold of Carmen’s hair and clothes. She threw herself to the ground, madly trying to put out the fire.


From the corner of her eye, she could see Rodrigo desperately rolling around, doing the same.


Before she lost consciousness, she felt someone throw a blanket over her burning body, and then pick her up and toss her carelessly into the back of a truck.


When Carmen woke up, an hour or so later, she was lying in a ditch, off the main highway. Rodrigo was there too. “I was so frightened I just lay there, pretending to be dead. I didn’t dare move.”


Slowly and painfully, they clambered to their feet and looked each other over. “Half of Rodrigo’s hair was missing, all his face was black and burnt,” she says.


Her own face, arms and hands were black and sore, and already peeling. Their clothes were almost totally shredded.


They hardly spoke a word to each other, Carmen remembers, such was the searing pain from their burns. But when a police patrol arrived, having been notified by some local workers who saw the two youngsters wandering “like zombies” across the road, Rodrigo shot Carmen a warning glance. “Don’t say anything, they’ll do away with us,”‘ he told her.


“I was just so full of anger and pain that all I said to the policemen was, ‘Just shoot me, please, now, so the pain stops,’” Carmen says.


The police took them to hospital. Carmen had second and third degree burns on two-thirds of her body.


She was in a coma for weeks.


Four days after arriving at hospital, Rodrigo died from his injuries.


Mourners and photographers around the coffin of Rodrigo Rojas Denegri as his body was relocated in 2003 Fellow student Rodrigo Rojas Denegri was just 19 when he died

His funeral became the focus of further nationwide demonstrations. And such was the scale of the outrage that even the then American ambassador to Chile attended, in spite of his government’s long standing support for Pinochet.


Unrepentant, the Chilean leader went on national television soon after to claim that Carmen and Rodrigo had been responsible for setting themselves on fire, because they had been carrying concealed Molotov cocktails, which had exploded and burnt them. That would continue to be the official version of events.


Carmen spent the first months in hospital in Chile, and was then moved by her family to Canada, where she continued with painful reconstructive treatment on her face and body.


In the first year alone, she had more than 40 separate operations. She gradually recovered the use of both her hands and legs, but lost the hearing in her right ear. She says, almost cheerfully, her face now has “a bit more of my own colour back”, although it is still scarred.


In the years that followed, Carmen travelled through Europe and North America denouncing the Pinochet regime.


Carmen Quintana in 1989

In 1991, a year after he was forced to step down as Chile’s president, a military tribunal held a hearing about her case. It cleared one of the officers present that day, Lt Pedro Fernandez Dittus, of responsibility for Rodrigo’s death, and for the attack on Carmen.


It merely found him “negligent” for having failed to seek adequate medical help. In 1993 he was sentenced to 600 days in prison by the Supreme Court.


Carmen, who was later awarded $500,000 (£320,000) in compensation by a Chilean judge, says she still wants her attackers – and their commanders – to face criminal charges in a civilian court.


“I feel that I am the voice of so many other Chileans who died,” she says.


Carmen Quintana was speaking to Witness – which airs weekdays on BBC World Service radio. You can hear Mike Lanchin’s report here.


You can follow the Magazine on Twitter and on Facebook


View the original article here



Burned alive for protesting